2024 Proposed Bills Affecting Florida Public and Private Employers
2024 Proposed Bills Affecting Florida Public and Private Employers
The 2024 Florida Legislative Session is officially in full swing. Below is a list of proposed bills that, if passed, may affect employers moving forward.
UPDATE 3/13/2024: The Florida Session concluded on Friday, March 8, 2024. Governor DeSantis now has 7 days (until Friday, March 15, 2024) to either sign or veto any proposed bills that were approved last minute by the Florida House and Senate. The majority of the bills died on the last day of session with only the Employment of Minors bill passing.
Invalid Restrictive Covenants in Health Care
Both Florida’s House of Representatives and the Senate have proposed similar bills relating to restrictive covenants. Currently in Florida, restrictive covenants are allowed and governed by existing Florida Statutes. Several years back, a group of specialty physicians passed a special law that provided exceptions to certain non-compete and restrictive covenants in specialty areas. These bills propose to broaden that carve out for additional health care providers and seek ban certain restrictive covenants relating to certain licensed physicians.
Update: DIED – HB11 died in Healthcare Regulation Subcommittee and SB458 died in Rules.
Employment of Minors
Both Florida’s House of Representatives and the Senate have proposed similar bills relating to the employment of minors. This has become a controversial bill because it proposes to eliminate certain employment restrictions for minors that are 16 and 17 years old when school is scheduled for the next day. Presently, 16 and 17 years (1) are not allowed to be employed before 6:30 am or after 11:00 pm, (2) are not allowed to work more than 8 hours in any one day when school is scheduled the following day and, (3) when school is in session, are not allowed to work more than 30 hours in any one week. The proposed changes provide that 16 and 17 years olds (1) are not allowed to be employed before 6:00 am instead of 6:30 am when school is scheduled the following day and (2) delete the restriction that the minors cannot work more than 30 hours in any one week when school is in session. Similar measures have been adopted by 24 other states. This could increase opportunities for 16 and 17 year olds to work and allow more opportunities for employers to employ 16 and 17 year olds who want to enter the workforce.
Supporters argue that it creates opportunities for those already working beyond 30 hours. Opponents claim it hinders students’ education, increases student absenteeism or dropout rates, and exploits children for cheap labor. The Senate has approved a version of the bill, but with some limitations. Senate President Kathleen Passidomo, who expressed support for the Senate version, emphasized the importance of parental consent and not sacrificing education time.
UPDATE: On February 8, 2024, the Florida House passed this controversial bill to extend 16 and 17 years old work hours during the school year. The House’s bill allows 16- and 17-year-olds to work more than eight hours in a day, even if school is the next day, or more than 30 hours a week when school is in session. It also eliminates the requirement for breaks every four hours of work. The Florida Senate approved the Florida House’s version of the bill before the session closed on Friday, March 8.
Paid Parental Leave
Both Florida’s House of Representatives and the Senate have proposed similar bills relating to paid parental leave. We have seen several different versions of this bill in the past few years. This proposed bill is limited to state workers who have been career service employees for a specified time period. If passed, this law would prohibit the State from requiring an employee to use annual sick leave. If passed, there is the possibility that this bill could be a gateway to paid parental leave for other state agencies, political subdivisions, and private employers.
Update: DIED – HB127 died in Constitutional Rights, Rule of Law & Government Operations Subcommittee and SB128 died in Governmental Oversight and Accountability.
Gender Identity Employment Practices
Both Florida’s House of Representatives and the Senate have proposed similar bills relating to gender identity in the workplace. Similar to the Stop Woke Act, this bill if passed would (1) prohibit employees from being required to use, from providing, and from being asked to provide certain titles and pronouns; (2) prohibit employees from being penalized for not providing certain titles and pronouns; (3) prohibits adverse personal action on the basis of deeply held religious or biology-based beliefs; and (4) provides administrative and civil remedies. This bill if passed, could potentially put employers in a difficult situation as such law would like conflict with federal law. If passed, there is a likelihood it would be challenged and enjoined like the Stop Woke Act.
Update: DIED – HB599 died in Constitutional Rights, Rule of Law & Government Operations Subcommittee and SB1382 died in Governmental Oversight and Accountability.
Prohibited Discrimination Based on Hairstyle, aka The Crown Act
Both Florida’s House of Representatives and the Senate have proposed similar bills prohibiting discrimination based on hairstyles. Dubbed the “Crown Act,” this bill proposes to protect against discrimination on natural hairstyles in the Florida K-12 public education system and provides that the term “race” includes hairstyles as another protected category.
Update: DIED – HB643 died in Education Quality Subcommittee and SB686 died in Judiciary.
Military Leave of Absence
Florida’s House of Representatives proposed a bill that provides certain public officials, including school boards, to provide full pay for the first ninety days of military leave.
Update: DIED – HB765 was “laid on the table,” a euphemism meaning “nothing further will be done in this matter.”
Expanding Autonomy for Certified Psychiatric Nurses in the Workplace
Both Florida’s House of Representatives and the Senate have proposed similar bills aimed at expanding what advanced practice registered nurses can do on their own. This bill aims to address the expected shortage of health care providers in the future.
Update: DIED – HB771 died in Healthcare Regulation Subcommittee and SB936 died in Health Policy.
Expanding Autonomy for Mental Health Professionals in the Workplace
Florida’s House of Representatives proposed a bill that is aimed at expanding what existing mental health professionals can do on their own in light of the expected shortage of health care providers in the future.
Update: DIED – HB827 died at the second reading.
Employment Leave for Crime Victims and Witnesses
Florida’s House of Representatives proposed a bill that would provide unpaid leave to crime victims, their family members, and witnesses to crimes. As written, there is no distinction for the size of the employer, the employee must give ten days’ notice, there is no cap on the leave, and no distinction is made between part-time and full-time employees. An employer cannot retaliate or discriminate against an employee for using the leave. If passed, there is concern this bill would not be feasible for many small employers.
Update: DIED – HB839 died in Constitutional Rights, Rue of Law & Government Operations Subcommittee.
Defining Biological Sex in the Workplace
Florida’s House of Representatives proposed a bill that would likely influence the Florida Civil Rights Act to change its definition of “sex” to be determined by what is on an employee’s birth certificate. This could potentially create an inconsistency between Title VII and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s position on what is “sex.”
Update: Died in Health & Human Services Committee.
Protections for Public Employers Who Use Medical Marijuana as Qualified Patients
Florida’s Senate proposed a bill prohibiting a public employer from taking adverse personnel action against an employee or a job applicant who uses medical marijuana and creates a private cause of action if employers violate this proposed law. At the time of publication, it does not have carve outs for safety intensive work. This law may create a conflict between employer’s obligations under federal law to maintain a drug-free workplace.
Update: Died in Health Policy.